What Independent Research Tells Us About Mold Risk in Building Materials

An overview of recent peer-reviewed research examining how common building materials respond to moisture exposure and why mold risk can develop before visible damage occurs.

Mold problems are often discussed once damage is visible. By that point, decisions are reactive and options are limited. Recent peer-reviewed research helps explain why earlier awareness and screening matter long before mold becomes obvious.

This article highlights findings from an independent academic study published in Building and Environment, a leading scientific journal. The research was conducted by investigators at Aalborg University and focuses on how common building materials respond to moisture exposure over time.

Key findings from the research

The study examined new, unused building materials including planed wood, plywood, OSB, particleboard, MDF, and gypsum board under different moisture scenarios. The researchers evaluated fungal growth under prolonged humidity, undiscovered water leaks, and flooding events.

Several important conclusions emerged

  1. Mold risk can exist before damage is visible

The study found that fungal spores may already be present within new building materials, not just on their surfaces. Even after surface cleaning or disinfection, fungal growth still occurred once moisture was introduced.

This suggests that relying solely on surface appearance or cleaning is not a reliable indicator of mold risk.

  1. Moisture exposure can trigger growth quickly

Under favorable conditions, fungal growth began within days. In scenarios involving hidden leaks or prolonged moisture exposure, growth occurred faster and more aggressively than under high humidity alone.

The timing and severity depended on material type, moisture source, and duration of exposure.

  1. Material type matters

Different materials behaved very differently. Processed wood products such as plywood and MDF showed higher moisture absorption and faster fungal development. Solid planed wood was generally more resistant but was not immune.

These differences help explain why mold problems can appear unevenly across a building, even when moisture exposure seems similar.

  1. Early drying reduces risk

In flooding scenarios where materials were able to dry quickly, fungal growth did not develop. This reinforces the importance of early detection and timely response when moisture events occur.

Why this research is relevant to early screening

The findings help explain why waiting for visible mold, odors, or occupant symptoms often means waiting too long. By the time those signs appear, fungal growth may already be established within materials.

Early screening and informed decision-making can help determine:

  • Whether further investigation is warranted

  • Whether drying alone may be sufficient

  • When remediation planning should begin

Access the full study

The full peer-reviewed article is available via Building and Environment and is published under an open-access license. "Pre-contamination of new, wood-based building materials: fungal diversity and susceptibility under different moisture scenarios." Loukou et al., 2026

Read the full article here

Editorial note

This post discusses independent academic research for educational purposes only. Mold Analyzer by Micro-Pak® is not affiliated with the authors or the journal and does not claim ownership of this research.

Learn more about Micro-Pak’s work in mold prevention.

Discover our research and solutions for mold control.