What Independent Research Tells Us About Mold Risk in Building Materials
An overview of recent peer-reviewed research examining how common building materials respond to moisture exposure and why mold risk can develop before visible damage occurs.
Mold problems are often discussed once damage is visible. By that point, decisions are reactive and options are limited. Recent peer-reviewed research helps explain why earlier awareness and screening matter long before mold becomes obvious.
This article highlights findings from an independent academic study published in Building and Environment, a leading scientific journal. The research was conducted by investigators at Aalborg University and focuses on how common building materials respond to moisture exposure over time.
Key findings from the research
The study examined new, unused building materials including planed wood, plywood, OSB, particleboard, MDF, and gypsum board under different moisture scenarios. The researchers evaluated fungal growth under prolonged humidity, undiscovered water leaks, and flooding events.
Several important conclusions emerged
Mold risk can exist before damage is visible
The study found that fungal spores may already be present within new building materials, not just on their surfaces. Even after surface cleaning or disinfection, fungal growth still occurred once moisture was introduced.
This suggests that relying solely on surface appearance or cleaning is not a reliable indicator of mold risk.
Moisture exposure can trigger growth quickly
Under favorable conditions, fungal growth began within days. In scenarios involving hidden leaks or prolonged moisture exposure, growth occurred faster and more aggressively than under high humidity alone.
The timing and severity depended on material type, moisture source, and duration of exposure.
Material type matters
Different materials behaved very differently. Processed wood products such as plywood and MDF showed higher moisture absorption and faster fungal development. Solid planed wood was generally more resistant but was not immune.
These differences help explain why mold problems can appear unevenly across a building, even when moisture exposure seems similar.
Early drying reduces risk
In flooding scenarios where materials were able to dry quickly, fungal growth did not develop. This reinforces the importance of early detection and timely response when moisture events occur.
Why this research is relevant to early screening
The findings help explain why waiting for visible mold, odors, or occupant symptoms often means waiting too long. By the time those signs appear, fungal growth may already be established within materials.
Early screening and informed decision-making can help determine:
Whether further investigation is warranted
Whether drying alone may be sufficient
When remediation planning should begin

Access the full study
The full peer-reviewed article is available via Building and Environment and is published under an open-access license. "Pre-contamination of new, wood-based building materials: fungal diversity and susceptibility under different moisture scenarios." Loukou et al., 2026
Editorial note
This post discusses independent academic research for educational purposes only. Mold Analyzer by Micro-Pak® is not affiliated with the authors or the journal and does not claim ownership of this research.
Additional
Articles

How Mold Analyzer Supports Standardized Mold Testing Across a Global Supply Chain
A detailed guide to standardizing mold detection across global supply chains, using Mold Analyzer to unify testing, reporting, traceability, and quality control across multiple locations.

How Mold Analyzer Detects Mold
An overview of how Mold Analyzer uses specialized chemistry and visual or digital analysis to deliver fast, reliable mold detection in real-world environments.